Annotated Bibliography On Health Policy Related To Your Topic …… Unit 4 Assessment – Annotated Bibliography on Health Policy Related to Your Topic Ins

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

Annotated Bibliography On Health Policy Related To Your Topic …… Unit 4 Assessment – Annotated Bibliography on Health Policy Related to Your Topic

Instructions
Estimated time to completion: 4 hours
For this assignment, you will create an annotated bibliography of resources related to your selected topic. This paper is not a formal paper but is structured as more of an outline. A title page and a reference page in APA style are required.
For this assignment, please follow these instructions:
· Research and choose articles that discuss and examine a specific health policy that relates to your selected health issue.
· The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to select the most relevant articles (research or evidence-based) from a peer reviewed and reliable journal or source.
· Do not cite or use a website for this assignment.
· Please note: A website is not considered an article. If you select a peer reviewed article published on a web site, use the correct citation. See section 6.31 and 6.32 of your APA manual.)
· Select five (5) articles from peer-reviewed journals that relate to your chosen issue and specific policy.
· Reference each article in proper APA format and include the following information underneath each reference:
· For each article write:
· 3 -5 sentence summary of the article
· 2 sentences about the purpose of the article
· 2 sentences why the article is credible for your topic
· 2 sentences explaining how you could use the article in your final project

Each annotated bibliography entry should be 250 words. Do not copy/paste the abstract for this assignment.

For an example of an annotated bibliography, please see the 
OWL website (Links to an external site.)
.
 
Rubric

NSG423 Paper Rubric 4

NSG423 Paper Rubric 4

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

15 pts

5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.

13.5 pts

4

Identifies a creative, focused and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.

12 pts

3

Identifies a focused and manageable/ doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.

10.5 pts

2

Identifies a topic that while manageable/ doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.

9 pts

1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.

0 pts

0

Does not clearly identify a topics that is relative to the assignment.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

15 pts

5

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.

13.5 pts

4

Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

12 pts

3

Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.

10.5 pts

2

Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

9 pts

1

Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

0 pts

0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process

10 pts

5

All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

9 pts

4

Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

8 pts

3

Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

7 pts

2

Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

6 pts

1

Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.

0 pts

0

The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

15 pts

5

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

13.5 pts

4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

12 pts

3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

10.5 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

9 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

15 pts

5

States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.

13.5 pts

4

States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.

12 pts

3

States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.

10.5 pts

2

States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

9 pts

1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.

0 pts

0

States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

10 pts

5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

9 pts

4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

8 pts

3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

7 pts

2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6 pts

1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0 pts

0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5 pts

5

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

4

The paper exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

4 pts

3

The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5 pts

Total Points: 90

Previous

Next

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality