Final Analysis And Recommendation Learning Outcomes Students will be able to: Describe the strategic economic questions all firms must answer. Apprais

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

Final Analysis And Recommendation Learning Outcomes
Students will be able to:

Describe the strategic economic questions all firms must answer.
Appraise various objectives and economic data needed for an industry analysis.
Investigate the economic data in order to determine the competitive environment of an industry.
Interpret economic data in order to create an economic forecast for an industry.
Determine opportunities and risks within the economic analysis.
Critique the economic decision-making process of organizations within an industry for alignment with the VBM.

Introduction
Understanding Step Five in PBL
Now that we have the proposed solutions ranked, the team can take the most promising one and move ahead with implementation. This is the stage where the proposal is operationalized.
Explaining the Solution
This week, we are addressing the details of the solution the team decided to implement. Planning how to bring a proposal to fruition requires thought and effort. Sometimes it is relatively easy to implement the plan, and sometimes it is difficult and requires convincing people of it as well as changes to the organizational structure.
In formulating the plan, the following factors are to be addressed:

What resources are required?
Who is involved and in what capacity?
Are new reporting structures needed?
Does anyone outside the organization need to be onboard?
What is the timeline (when to start work, when to implement, when to complete implementation)?
How does the definition of success reflect virtuous decision making?
How is success measured?

This is not an exhaustive list. You may add other factors as appropriate.
The deliverable for this step is:
A plan outlining at least the following:

Resources required
Personnel required
Concrete steps to be taken
Timeline
Measure(s) of success
How the measure(s) of success reflect virtuous decision making

Instructions for Deliverable
As a team learning project, the individual’s participation in the processes of the team is as important as the product produced by the team. Therefore, it is very possible that team members will earn different scores for the assignment due to individual differences in the team process. It is important to understand that low performance in the team processes has a ripple effect on other students’ contributions to the development of the final paper and its quality. This grading approach provides the ethical principle of equity in the assignment’s grades. 

Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. You can learn more about the specific skills being assessed by reviewing the links in Problem-Based Learning Resources(new tab).
Remember to review the problem and the resources available on the Problem Overview(new tab) page.
Meet as a team to ensure you have a shared understanding of the requirements for this step. As a team, use your PBL plan to outline how you will all meet the requirements individually and collectively.
You are to use the PBL Team Forum discussion link for the development of your deliverable. This will give the professor opportunity to coach the team, if needed. If your team chooses to use another tool to develop your PBL deliverables, you must invite the professor to join your site.
Develop a plan outlining at least the following:

Resources required
Personnel required
Concrete steps to be taken
Timeline
Measure(s) of success
How the measure(s) of success reflect virtuous decision making

The Final Analysis and Recommendation should be written in APA format. If any resources are cited in the plan, use APA style to format in-text citations and the references list. 
Clearly indicate the contributions from each team member in Step Five. This can be submitted as part of the deliverables or as a note to the instructor on the Assignment submission page. 
One person from each team must post the deliverable to the group assignment submission page AND to the Showcase discussion page per the schedule outlined in your Team PBL Plan but no later than the end of Workshop Seven. When posting to the discussion, please list the names of all the team members. Your classmates will need to access your deliverable for one of the individual assessments in Step 6. 12/11/21, 7:09 PM Preview Rubric: Step 5 : Final Analysis and Recommendation Rubric (95 Points) – 3FA2021 Econ Analysis/Virtuous Ldrs (BADM-704-01A) – …

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=152256&rubricId=470413&originTool=quicklinks 1/2

Step 5 : Final Analysis and Recommendation Rubric

(95 Points)
Course: 3FA2021 Econ Analysis/Virtuous Ldrs (BADM-704-01A)

Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement

Inadequate/Faili
ng

Criterion Score

The plan / 45

Virtuous

Business in

decision

making

/ 45

45 points

(42-45 points)

The plan is

detailed and

actionable with

specific activities

and clear

measures of

success in

relation to the

problem

statement.

41 points

(37-41 points)

The plan is

actionable with

specific activities

and adequate

measures of

success.

36 points

(22-36 points)

The plan is does

not have clear

recommendation

s for activities or

adequate

measures of

success.

21 points

(0-21 points)

The

recommendation

s are not

actionable nor

have good

measures of

success.

45 points

(42-45 points)

A clear and

compelling

discussion of

how VBM

informs how

success is

defined.

41 points

(37-41 points)

Adequate

discussion of

how success is

defined in light

of VBM.

36 points

(22-36 points)

Some discussion

of how success is

defined in light

of VBM.

21 points

(0- 21 points)

No or minimal

discussion of

how success is

defined in light

of VBM.

12/11/21, 7:09 PM Preview Rubric: Step 5 : Final Analysis and Recommendation Rubric (95 Points) – 3FA2021 Econ Analysis/Virtuous Ldrs (BADM-704-01A) – …

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=152256&rubricId=470413&originTool=quicklinks 2/2

Total / 95

Overall Score

Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement

Inadequate/Faili
ng

Criterion Score

Written

Communicatio

n

/ 55 points

(5 points)

Report is clearly

written, logically

organized, free

of grammatical

errors, and

follows APA

formatting.

4 points

(4 points)

Report is

generally well

written and

organized with

limited errors

that do not

impede meaning.

Paper follows

APA formatting.

3 points

(3 points)

Report has

organizational

issues that make

it difficult to

follow key

points. Paper

follows APA

formatting with

errors.

2 points

(1-2 points)

Report is unclear

and difficult to

follow. APA

formatting is not

adhered.

Excellent
88 points minimum

Competent
78 points minimum

Needs Improvement
69 points minimum

Inadequate/Failing
0 points minimum

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality