Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Clinical Practice Guidelines And Protocols Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Clinical Practice Guidelines and Protocols I

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Clinical Practice Guidelines And Protocols Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Clinical Practice Guidelines and Protocols

Search and locate one systematic review or practice guideline in your topic of interest (Include the citation). 
Evaluate the following: 

The systematic review or practice guideline relies primarily on studies conducted in the last five years. 
The review provides support for the importance of the study 
The authors have use primary, rather than secondary sources. 
Studies are critically examined and reported objectively 
The systematic review or practice guideline is organized so that a logical unfolding of Ideas is apparent that supports the need for the review 
The systematic review or practice guideline ends with a summary of the most important knowledge.

Minimum 300 words How to write the Literature Review

How to write an Evidence Based Practice Literature
Review Paper

After the presentation the student will be able to:

Understand the purpose and basic requirements of an effective literature review.
Critically assess research materials.
Develop strategies for inventing, organizing, and drafting a literature review.
Cite sources appropriately.

What is a Literature Review?
Unlike research, EBP isn’t about developing new knowledge or validating existing knowledge. It’s
about translating the evidence and applying it to clinical decision-making.
The purpose of EBP is to use the best evidence available to make patient-care decisions. However,
we need to communicate and disseminate best practices. The following presentation will explain the
steps in developing an EBP paper.
There is a pressing need for nurses to participate and, in many circumstances, take the lead in
managing change in clinical practice to improve the quality of care.
A Literature review It is not a discussion of creative literature like that from Shakespeare, Poe,
and J.K. Rowling. Simply put: A Literature Review surveys, summarizes, and links together research
(a.k.a., literature) in a given field.

Annotated Bibliography
Please note that a Literature Review is NOT an annotated bibliography.

An annotated bibliography is the following:

The full References/Bibliography/Works Cited citation for a source;
A brief summation of the major points of the work;
A brief indication of how this research is helpful to your project;
And at times, any indications of weaknesses that are in the source that could compromise using it.

Why a Lierature Review is Important?
Literature Reviews are considered important for numerous reasons:

They allow you to know just WHAT is out there;
They allow you to demonstrate mastery over a subject;
They allow you to locate your area of research within the literature, such as “how does this fit in with everything else that
has been written on this subject?”

Getting Started

APA format
APA Style Presentation

Please review the following presentation

Writing an Outline
Using headings to provide visual “cues” for readers:

Sections are well delineated with descriptive headings and subheadings.

IMRD structure (Example)

Introduction What question was studied?
Methods How was the question studied?
ResultsWhat was found?
Discussion What do the results mean?

Should I read the article?

What is the essence of this EBP review—the “take home” message?
Clinical Problem – in one sentence if possible
Purpose of the project
Summary of evidence and strength of evidence supporting practice change
Proposed practice change
Implementation strategies
Evaluation methods
Conclusions/Nursing Implications
It should not exceed 250-350 words

*The abstract for your proposal includes all the above elements except the outcomes and conclusions/nursing implications.

What is paper about?

Max info in least words <12 words <100 characters The title is a label Introduces the work Should almost never contain abbreviations Might… Be provocative or controversial Ask a question Make statement of conclusion Question: easier to understand, more impact State results *One trick professional writers use to unify a work is extracting a title from an essential piece in the paper's final summary/conclusion or a main section. Look for a phrase in these areas that really captures the paper's main idea or argument (thesis) and turn it into a title. Introduction In the introduction, explain why the topic is important and give the reader an idea of where you are going in your paper. The introduction should answer ? What is the Problem/issue? Brief background of problem (stats) Why was this an important question? What is the Approach? It should also determine if the proposed evidence based improvement is actually needed. It should be 2-3 paragraphs, <450 words First paragraph Introduce broad area but don't be too global (for example, discussing the pain when the topic is on phantom pain) The introductory paragraph should engage the reader's interest by setting out clearly the question that the paper is attempting to address, how you plan to address it, and why it is worth addressing in the first place; You may use common knowledge for example Hand washing has demonstrated to reduce germs and bacteria contamination Second paragraph Narrowing: As you narrow down the research, the major categories you identify will probably end up being the section headers for your paper. Discuss the general importance of your topic for those in your field Problem Statement: The problem statement needs to include the general area of concern, a brief background about the concern, and the significance of the concern. A justification of the need is also included. The justification may indicate that there is a gap in the knowledge, conflicting findings, or omission of a group. You may see one of these phrases at the end of the problem statement: 1. Little is known about.… 2. Findings of previous studies are conflicting…. 3. Few studies of this have been done…. Why is it important? Does it fill a needed gap in knowledge base? 1. What is context? 2. Who is affected? 3. Where is ocurring 4. When is Ocurring? 5. How serious is this issue Last paragraph Purpose: (how it will help resolve problem or contribute to knowledge base) Sets complete roadmap for paper Slavishly followed in order and with same words for rest of paper. PICO/PICOT Statement: It is stated as a clinical practice problem format, such as PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) or PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Timeline). Methods Section Enough information for: How literature was searched? Should I believe this review? Inclusion/exclusion criteria?What criteria led you to include or exclude sources? (Credibility, Validity and Reliability). What databases did you search? What search terms did you use? (keywords) How many total articles on the subject did you find? *Pay attention to domain name extensions (.edu, .gov, .org) as these tend to be more reliable. Be selective of .com sites. Learn how to evaluate sites critically Background and Significance Basic material about the subject, to provide context for the reader. Very often, you will encounter the same concept defined in different ways by different writers. Brief paragraph introducing sections to come 1. Brief history of the problem 2. Population who is affected? 3. Where is concentrated ( Areas of concentration) 4. Definitions of terms Review of the Evidence Section The real "meat" of your paper will be the actual points of discussion. Objectively present your findings, and explain what was found These will be a series of paragraphs that support your purpose , with each point occupying one or two paragraphs, depending on the issue. Some people take notes and come back to articles. However, it is recommended that you paraphrasing AS YOU GO. CITE AS YOU GO! You will not have to go back to examine a source. Think about each Study Note how each article relates to your topic keep your specific topic in mind all the time and make sure your articles address it. If not, do not include Organize your sources See the following Matrix Reference Conceptual Framework Research question The methodology; Analysis & Results Conclusion Implications for future research Implications for practice Always note if the study was qualitative or quantitative Quantitative: results presented as stats and numbers Explicitly stated hypotheses large (100-1500), random sample from particular population objectively scored instruments inferential statistics -- make inferences about pop from sample Qualitative: results presented as narrative General, nonspecific problem, with no rigid, specific purposes small, purposive (not random) sample measure with unstructured instruments (interviews) results in words with emphasis on understanding sample Note if study is experimental or non-experimental Experimental: treatments administered to participants for purposes of study effects of treatments assessed almost all are quantitative Non experimental: participants' traits measured without attempting to change them quantitative or qualitative do not use the term 'experiment' to describe, use 'study,' 'investigation,' etc. If an experiment, how were subjects assigned to test conditions? Guarantees no bias in assignment. More weight given to true experiments (with RA). Cause-and-effect vs. correlation Reliability Validity Sampling, demographics, statistical significance Make notes on demographics. Could demographics have played a role in results? (no way you can say for sure, but might raise question How large is difference?... not just significance statistically significant -- greater than chance, not necessarily big. Major flaws? (do not dissect each article) Safe to assume that all empirical studies have them. Leves of evidence Discussion Section Drawing Connections Discussion is about the implications of the findings This is a key step. Gives meaning to the results, the "why" When looking at these articles, begin to note connections between studies. can subgroups be created? consider consistency of results from study to study if discrepant, provide relevant info about research, trying to identify possible explanations for the differences Places results in context of previous research Assesses importance of findings Acknowledges limitations of methods Identifies new areas for exploration and/or 'next steps' Discussion is about what the results mean Conclusion Plan to present conclusions and implications conclusion: statement about state of knowledge using degrees of evidence. "it seems safe to conclude that..." "one conclusion might be..." if weight of evidence does not favor one conclusion over the other, say so implications: statement of what people or organizations should do in light of existing research. What actions (interventions) seem promising based on review you are now an expert and can offer conclusions and implications. Make specific (relevant) suggestions about gaps, can be populations (understudied groups), methodologies, etc How to review your Paper? Tips on writing : Style, Mechanics, Language Avoid complex sentence structure (long convoluted sentences confuse the reader), Avoid Excessive Wordiness: do not write "time period," when either "time" or "period" will suffice. do not write "due to the fact that," when a simple "because" will do. Use simple and clear English. Every sentence must have a subject and a verb, unless it is part of a direct quote. There are no other exceptions to this rule. Avoid slang, colloquialisms, and idioms . Example "bumped off" – to describe a "killing" Avoid Imprecise Language: Avoid words like "good" She was a "good" leader. Better to say: She was a "strong" leader; she was an "effective" leader DO NOT use contractions. Words like "didn't," "couldn't," and "wouldn't" Use definitive, specific, concrete, language Some words and phrases to avoid include good, bad, perfect, ideal, seemingly, would, seem to show, in terms of, based on, in light of. Prefer words and phrases that clearly illustrate your point), Make the paragraph the unit of composition (avoid one-sentence paragraphs, and ensure paragraphs contain meaningful concepts). Transitions Writing Transitions By Purdue University OWL Transitional Words and Phrases By The UNiversity of Wisconsin Madison APA Pitfalls DO NOT use first person. In scholarly writing, the author is assumed to have "distance" from his or her subject. You should therefore write as an outside observer, not a participant, and you should treat the reader in the same way. This means that pronouns such as "I," "we," or "you" are inappropriate. ONLY use acronyms AFTER you have defined their meaning; Spell out numbers from 0-9 and use the numerals for all numbers above 9; Make sure that every source you cite in your paper is included in the References page(s); Double-space ALL lines,. Be consistent with verb tenses. APA recommends past (discussed) or present perfect (have discussed) when presenting results. Active Voice: "Washington chopped down the cherry tree" Passive Voice: "The cherry tree was chopped down by George Washington." [wordy & clumsy] Put statements in positive form For example, 30% of those contacted responded as opposed to 70% did not respond). Excessive Quotations: Avoid overusing direct quotations Often writers who have yet to develop their own "voice" have a tendency to use a lot of direct quotes from other authors. Dumb Mistakes confusing "its" with "it's," "there" with "they're" or "their," and "who's" with "whose." subjects must agree in number with verbs, and pronouns with their antecedents; Example: " "Each of them had their own ideas" is wrong. "Each of them had his [or her] own ideas" is correct. Plagiarism Avoiding plagiarism means citing every single source that you used in writing a paper—and "use" means draw any sort of fact (except those which are common knowledge) or interpretation. Check APA style manual for correct use of citations Reflect Higher-Order Thinking Baccaulaureate writing must reflect the higher-order thinking skills of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. in short, your writing must demonstrate your ability to read and analyze the ideas of other scholars, evaluate them, synthesize or integrate them into a meaningful whole, if necessary, and use them in support of your own arguments objective evidence, as opposed to subjective opinion, is the coin of scholarly

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality